5.24 Safeguarding Response to Obesity when Neglect is an Issue
This policy has been updated to reflect the changes to the Children’s Advice and Duty Services (CADS) that comes into effect from 17th October 2018.
This is a multi-agency policy to support professionals when working with children and young people when it is considered that a child’s obesity may be related to neglect.
The management of obesity is complex and challenging. Obesity in childhood is a significant public health issue. 34% of children measured at year 6 were either overweight or obese in England in 2016 PHE data. Obesity is the greatest risk factor for Type 2 diabetes and the rates for Type 2 diabetes have risen significantly over the last decade. Obesity is also a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and cancer Childhood obesity foundation.
The World Health Organisation and American Medical Association recognise obesity as a disease. The root causes of obesity are complex and obesity remains difficult for professionals to treat once established. Obesity is caused generally by a long term positive energy balance related to changes to modern diets and a reduction in the level of activity. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) produced guidance in 2014 NICE guidance Obesity and an updated population-level approach to prevention in 2015 NICE Prevention.
Weight management is an emotive issue and many families struggle to maintain a healthy diet and take the recommended amount of physical activity. This is on a background of a modern lifestyle with diets high in processed food and sugar, availability of sugary drinks, food advertising and sedentary activities resulting in reduced physical activity.
Wherever possible, it is important to work with families to understand potential risks and signs of safety. Morbid obesity can affect a child’s outcomes in a number of ways, including academic achievement and emotional wellbeing; in a very small minority of cases, obesity can be life threatening. It is imperative that any parent or carer who is trying to manage their child’s weight understands the risks and has access to appropriate support and guidance.
However, professionals working with obese children should be mindful of the possible role of abuse or neglect in contributing to obesity. When assessing such children, a comprehensive picture of the child’s functioning from a health, psychological, and educational perspective is necessary and older children and adolescents should be offered the chance to talk apart from their parents to explore their understanding of their weight issues (Framework for practice). This should be as for any clinical condition which is having a significant impact on health and wellbeing of a child.
2. The Child and Family
Obesity is the most common nutritional disorder affecting children, and is much more common in families living in poverty and those from some ethnic minorities (National obesity observatory).
Consideration must be given to cultural and ethnic influences when considering obesity as a potential harm in safeguarding children. In particular an understanding of varying approaches to what constitutes healthy foods, food preparation, exercise and a healthy weight must be explored in the cultural context of the family. It is important not to make assumptions about, or stigmatise, certain cultural beliefs in regard to weight nor the belief system which sits behind those values. This may require some education and wider consultation to be undertaken by the practitioner when working with culturally diverse groups thus ensuring a parity of approach and assessment of risk.
In addition to the physical consequences of obesity, children experience significant emotional and psychological distress. Teasing and discrimination is not uncommon, with resultant low self-esteem anxiety and depression.
Obese children are more often ill, experience more day-to-day health issues (e.g. breathlessness, discomfort, fatigue), have greater school absence, healthcare attendances and hospital admissions. Obesity in childhood is often the harbinger of adult obesity. 79% of adolescents who are obese are likely to remain obese as adults. Being overweight or obese in childhood has both short-term and longer-term consequences for health, with greatly increased risks of disability, chronic ill-health and premature death. Moreover, once severe, obesity is very difficult to treat effectively. Obesity can be a result of an eating disorder that requires management through child and adolescent mental health services.
Morbid obesity may have serious health implications for the child Complications of obesity (see Appendix 1 below). The health risks increase with duration and severity of obesity and in rare instances may have a fatal outcome.
Obesity may be part of a more complex health problem, which further jeopardises a child’s wellbeing.
Examples include obesity:
- In a child with a genetic condition, such as Prader-Willi Syndrome.
- In a child with autism or learning difficulties.
- Associated with other health problems, such as blindness or arthritis which hamper mobility.
- From treatment with steroids or other treatment known to increase risk of obesity.
- Complicated by asthma, obstructive sleep apnoea, Type 2 Diabetes or other obesity-related illness.
Some families and even professionals working with the family will use the attendant health issues to justify, explain or excuse the child’s obesity and whilst a medical condition may be an additional challenge it should be considered in the context of the parent’s engagement. The dual diagnosis of obesity and another health condition may place additional strains on a family’s ability to cope, and amplifies the risks to the individual child. It is this group of children in whom obesity most commonly becomes a safeguarding concern. It is important to consider these cases under Management of Complex Health Issues policy. It is imperative to use professional judgement when considering each case.
3. Legal Framework, 1989 Children Act
Where there is clear medical advice that the child is likely to suffer or is suffering significant harm as a result of obesity and/or obesity related issues, as well as evidence that the care givers are unable or unwilling to engage in a plan that will realistically lead to improvements for that child, then the case requires action under Section 47 of the Children’s Act.
Where there is medical evidence that the child is unlikely to achieve/maintain a reasonable standard of health/wellbeing, but parents are engaging and/or there is no immediate risk of significant harm, then the case requires action under Section 17 of the Children’s Act.
Case management should be regularly reviewed to ensure that the risks to the child’s health and wellbeing are monitored carefully to ensure appropriate and timely actions are taken under the legal framework.
4. When does obesity become a safeguarding issue?
Childhood obesity can become a child protection concern if parents fail to provide their child adequate treatment or when parents behave in a way that actively promotes treatment failure, as with any chronic illness in a child. Russell Viner in an article published in the British Medical Journal (21.8.10, Volume 341) proposed a framework for practice.
Parental behaviours of concern include:
- Consistently failing to attend appointments;
- Refusing to engage with various professionals or with weight management initiatives; or
- Actively not follow weight management initiatives.
These behaviours are of particular concern if an obese child is at imminent risk of comorbidity—for example, obstructive sleep apnoea, hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, or mobility restrictions. Clear objective evidence of this behaviour over a sustained period is required, and the treatment offered must have been adequate and evidence based.
Obesity may be part of wider concerns about neglect or emotional abuse therefore it is essential to evaluate other aspects of the child’s health and wellbeing and determine if concerns are shared by other professionals such as the family general practitioner or education services. This will require a multi-agency collaborative assessment, including psychology or other mental health assessment. If concerns are expressed, a multi-agency meeting is appropriate.
Assessment of parental capacity to respond to that particular child’s needs is central to this, such as parent(s) struggling to control their own weight and eating, but they are not the only factors. Admission to hospital or another controlled environment may be useful because it allows a more detailed assessment of behaviours and parent-child interactions. However, admission removes a child from his or her wider familiar environment as well as from parents so weight loss in a controlled environment needs to be evaluated carefully and although on its own is not evidence of neglect or abuse does indicate the potential for the child to be able to avoid gaining weight.
5. Safeguarding Trigger Points
All trigger points need to be understood in terms of managing lifestyle, including healthy eating, physical activity and behaviour change, linked to the child’s overall health, safety and wellbeing.
Lack of capacity to engage
- Parents/carers unable to effectively provide for the child’s health needs due to additional family factors, such as learning difficulties, socio-economic issues, unmet parental needs.
- Unable to attend appointments and make necessary changes to lifestyle.
- Weight continues, or appears to continue, to increase/or not to decrease.
Unwilling to engage
- Not attending appointments
- Transient or intermittent engagement
- Unwilling to make any changes to child’s lifestyle even with appropriate support and intervention by agencies
- Parent/carer refusing, rejecting or ignoring professional advice regarding ongoing significant health risks to their child if the weight continues to increase
- Actively frustrating efforts of professionals or child to reduce weight gain
- Oppositional behaviour: parents/carers unable/unwilling to set and maintain boundaries with child to manage lifestyle changes and allow further weight gain.
- Appearing helpless and/or overwhelmed
- Being aggressive and/or confrontational
- Using media and/or politicians and/or legal advisers to challenge the professionals
- Over sensationalise particular comments/issues to detract from the significant harm being experienced by the child/young person.
6. Identifying Children where there are Safeguarding Concerns
There are number of warning signs and indicators that will support practitioners working with children and young people to identify safeguarding concerns for children who are visibly overweight. The following list should be considered in the context of the child’s overall presentation and not in isolation:
The list above is not exhaustive and need to be considered in line with safeguarding trigger points.
7. The role of the LSCB & Individual Organisations where there are safeguarding concerns identified
Professionals and the public should be aware that obesity becomes a safeguarding issue when there are wider concerns about neglect and/or emotional abuse. The children’s workforce must be alert to these children, who may be isolated and/or not accessing universal services, and ensure that the risks are recognised and assessed appropriately.
Professionals and the public need to recognise that safeguarding is everybody’s responsibility. However, when dealing with complex issues such as obesity there are specific contributions that can be and should be made by different agencies and these interventions and assessments need to be child focused, co-ordinated and shared appropriately.
It is important that the child’s health needs are properly assessed, including, where possible, assessment of any environmental factors that are having a negative impact on their weight gain or loss. This will enable close monitoring of the parents’/carers’ ability to support the child to maintain a healthy weight and active lifestyle. It is important that the paediatrician ensures health provision is well co-ordinated and there is good communication between those involved.
Where an obese child is on a Child Protection (CP) Plan, there are two key practice points to follow:
In identified safeguarding cases, consideration should be given to appointing the paediatrician as medical lead for all the child’s presenting conditions. There should be regular communication with the child’s GP to assess whether or not any other arising health concerns are considered in light of concerns over his/her health. This principle should be applied for any health professionals responsible for primary care, such as school nurses or health visitors, to ensure that the paediatrician maintains a holistic overview of the risks.
9.Other Health Professionals
All other health professionals who are involved in caring for a child should be mindful of the differences between obesity as a health issue and a safeguarding concern, using the indicators above. Most cases of obesity will be managed by health, working with parents, however when the lifestyle challenges trigger failure to thrive concerns, safeguarding referrals should be considered. When a health professional recognises that their interventions alone are not having any impact on the weight management and the health risks are escalating, they need to ensure that their concerns are shared with the wider children’s workforce.
Schools who have concerns about a child’s weight must establish that the child’s health is being managed and, with parents’ consent, confirm with health colleagues that an appropriate weight management programme is in place. If consent is not gained, the school should clearly record its concerns and keep a log to monitor the weight, how it is being managed and whether the parents are supporting the child to exercise and eat healthily.
The school is in the strongest position to monitor the day to day impact of persistent weight gain and the parents’ ability to manage the child’s weight and should not rely solely on the health professionals’ interventions. If the child’s weight continues to increase and the indicators noted above are identified, a referral to MASH should be made). Challenges need to be recorded clearly.
Schools should be prepared to challenge any barriers presented by parents in addressing lifestyle changes such as not allowing the child to participate in physical activities. All concerns should be recorded and where appropriate shared with partners to better assess the risks.
Schools involved in child protection conferences and/or core groups should ensure that they record on a regular basis any information that the child gives them regarding their eating patterns so that they can report on whether or not parents are being compliant with the CP Plan. Consideration should be given to the impact of obesity on the child’s emotional wellbeing and the school should record observations on any signs of emotional harm, such as depression, isolation or bullying. Any activities that the child cannot engage with due to their weight should be noted in terms of the impact of social isolation as well as affecting educational attainment. This should be recorded in the log.
11. Social Care
Social workers – including frontline staff, their managers, and conference chairs – with caseloads of children with obesity related safeguarding concerns should be aware of the safeguarding warning signs and indicators noted above. As safeguarding leads, they should ensure that all aspects of non-compliance with the CP Plan are communicated to all core group members as and when this occurs, and not wait until reporting the incidences at the next core group. This will enable any patterns to be identified, and where the parent/carer fails to comply with a particular agency/agencies to be identified quickly and challenged. Parents/care givers and young people will need to be informed that this will happen and the reasons why.
Independent Reviewing Officers working with Looked After Children (LAC) who are obese should challenge any lack of progress to reduce/manage weight within the care plan. Carers need to be supported to understand the risks and ensure that the child in their care makes appropriate progress.
Childhood Obesity per se should be managed primarily by parents and carers with incremental support from Health and Children’s Social Care.
The police may well engage in multi-agency strategy discussions in cases where a child is considered likely to suffer significant harm (Section 47 of the Children Act 1989) where their obesity is cited as a primary factor. However, the role of the police within the Child Safeguarding Partnership is to investigate and prosecute criminal offences. To that end any neglect or ill-treatment of a child would ordinarily be considered under Section 1(1) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 which states:
‘If a person who has attained the age of sixteen years and has responsibility for a child or young person under that age, wilfully assaults, ill-treats, neglects, abandons, or exposes him, or causes or procures him to be assaulted, ill-treated, neglected, abandoned, or exposed, in a manner likely to cause him unnecessary suffering or injury to health (including injury to or loss of sight, hearing, limb, or organ of the body, and any mental derangement), that person is guilty of a misdemeanour’.
Any police involvement must be determined by the facts presented. There has to be a very distinct line drawn where the potential harm is directly attributable to wilful acts or omissions by the parent or carer. In any event the police involvement will be reliant on the combined information of the agencies engaged with the child and information sharing will be crucial to any action taken by police.
Whilst not prescriptive, the below should be considered as the threshold to police involvement.
- The child is obese and their weight is continuing overall to increase disproportionately to age OR is not reducing in line with a realistic and achievable health plan AND
- Paediatric examination shows that this is leading to co-morbidity factors (other medical factors as a direct result of the obesity) AND
- The parents or carers are aware of the risks and have the capacity and capability to engage in their child’s treatment AND
- They are frustrating, or unnecessarily failing to engage in, a coordinated plan to improve the child’s health AND
- The child is likely to be caused unnecessary suffering or injury to health.
It will be important to be able to discern cases where the parents or carers require significant support in the management of their child’s obesity. Such cases may include genetic conditions (e.g. Prader-Willi Syndrome) or perhaps cases where the parents or carers do not have the ability to properly manage these more complex needs. Except in exceptional circumstances these cases will be managed by Health and Children’s Social Care.
13. Referrals and Risk Assessment
It can be difficult to discuss obesity with parents who may be hostile, unreceptive or who lack capacity to recognise the safeguarding implications. Regardless, the protection and welfare of the child is the priority and it is everyone’s responsibility to act on their concerns. It is likely that professionals will have attempted to engage families over a period of time.
Concerns should be raised with the Children’s Advice and Duty Service (CADS), with the parents’/carers consent unless there are significant safeguarding concerns (see Legal Framework above). Any professional considering referring a child where the safeguarding concerns are linked to obesity should consider the contents of this policy and refer to the Threshold Guide before making the referral, specifically safeguarding indicators and triggers.
To aid professionals in making this decision an analysis tool has been developed and is attached:
This information should form part of the conversation with the Consultant Social Worker in CADS.
The chapter was added to the manual in May 2015.